Re: [Bitcoin-development] Tor hidden service support

2012-06-27 Thread Andy Parkins
On 2012 June 26 Tuesday, Pieter Wuille wrote: > Additionally, such addresses are exchanged and relayed via the P2P network. > To do so, we reused the fd87:d87e:eb43::/48 IPv6 range. Each address in Yuck. Can't we pinch a few of the addr.services bits to store an address family? AF_INET, AF_INE

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Tor hidden service support

2012-06-26 Thread Gregory Maxwell
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 7:01 PM, grarpamp wrote: > You are going to want to include the block of the Phatom project as well: > https://code.google.com/p/phantom/ > fd00:2522:3493::/48 Perhaps some argument to add blocks to the IsRoutable check is in order? Then people who use overlay networks th

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Tor hidden service support

2012-06-26 Thread grarpamp
> Additionally, such addresses are exchanged and relayed via the P2P network. > To do so, we reused the fd87:d87e:eb43::/48 IPv6 range. Each address in this > 80-bit range is mapped to an onion address, and treated as belonging to a > separate network. This network range is the same as used by the