On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 02:48:14PM -0800, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
> > I want to get some feedback.. I've used distributed version control
> > systems for a long time, and the most useful feature is to be able
> > to merge two different fork
On Tuesday, December 17, 2013 10:41:30 PM Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
> I want to get some feedback.. I've used distributed version control
> systems for a long time, and the most useful feature is to be able
> to merge two different forks.
>
> So what's the equivalent of this for Bitcoin or other cry
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Transactions != blocks. There is no need for a "merge" block.
You are free to trade transactions off-line, so long as you are
certain the other parties are not secretly double-spending coins they
send you on the block chain.
When connection to the bi
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
> I want to get some feedback.. I've used distributed version control
> systems for a long time, and the most useful feature is to be able
> to merge two different forks.
We already automatically merge forks that we become aware of simply b
4 matches
Mail list logo
