>
>
> I don't understand why you say my proposal would make the protocol more
> stateful. I think it doesn't.
> Each reply is only the result of the current request only, and there is
> no new session information.
>
I also wondered this. My first thought was that it's basically the same as
the PI
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Amir Taaki wrote:
> Jeff elaborated the problems very well, but I just want to add this:
>
> Your change is essentially relying (trusting) the server to track a piece
> of information (your state).
No, it is more about distinguishing between replies (multiple as
to trigger the next round. It's
> be better if there was no state whatsoever.
>
>
> From: Jeff Garzik
> To: sirk...@gmail.com
> Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 6:12 PM
> Subject: Re: [Bitcoin
tcoin-development] Adding request/reply id in messages
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Christian Bodt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to discuss the following bitcoin protocol improvement proposal:
>
> Adding request/reply id in all messages (in the message header,
> based o
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Christian Bodt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to discuss the following bitcoin protocol improvement proposal:
>
> Adding request/reply id in all messages (in the message header,
> based on what was done for the "checksum" field)
>
> The original reason is t
> For example, doing a second
> identical "getblocks" request will not result in more "inv" replies, as
> the client
> prevents retransmits.
Yes, the current prototype implementation modifies that. "getblocks" always
results in one "inv" with [0-500] elements.
It also removes the filtering on pre
-development] Adding request/reply id in messages
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 11:41:05AM -0400, Gavin Andresen wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Christian Bodt wrote:
> > I would like to discuss the following bitcoin protocol improvement proposal:
> >
> > Adding re
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 11:41:05AM -0400, Gavin Andresen wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Christian Bodt wrote:
> > I would like to discuss the following bitcoin protocol improvement proposal:
> >
> > Adding request/reply id in all messages (in the message header,
> > based on wh
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Christian Bodt wrote:
> I would like to discuss the following bitcoin protocol improvement proposal:
>
> Adding request/reply id in all messages (in the message header,
> based on what was done for the "checksum" field)
That seems like a perfectly reasona
9 matches
Mail list logo
