Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: relax the IsStandard rules for P2SH transactions

2014-06-19 Thread Peter Todd
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 09:54:31AM -0400, Gavin Andresen wrote: > RE: soft-forks bumping version numbers: > > Yes, we have consensus that is the way we will do it. I should probably > turn https://gist.github.com/gavinandresen/2355445 into an informational > BIP. Sounds like it could turn EvalSc

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: relax the IsStandard rules for P2SH transactions

2014-06-19 Thread Gavin Andresen
RE: soft-forks bumping version numbers: Yes, we have consensus that is the way we will do it. I should probably turn https://gist.github.com/gavinandresen/2355445 into an informational BIP. RE: malleability: Orthogonal (but related) issue to IsStandard. Detecting Scripts that leave extra items

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: relax the IsStandard rules for P2SH transactions

2014-06-19 Thread Peter Todd
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 08:52:22AM -0400, Gavin Andresen wrote: > RE: most of Peter Todd's comments: > > All of that should be separate pull requests. Big Honking Pull Requests > are harder to review and are more likely to be bike-shedded to death. Well, just doing one and not the rest isn't nec

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: relax the IsStandard rules for P2SH transactions

2014-06-18 Thread Gavin Andresen
RE: most of Peter Todd's comments: All of that should be separate pull requests. Big Honking Pull Requests are harder to review and are more likely to be bike-shedded to death. RE: not relaying/mining transactions with OP_NOPs so miners don't mine up-version transactions that are invalid under

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: relax the IsStandard rules for P2SH transactions

2014-06-18 Thread Wladimir
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 9:40 PM, Gavin Andresen wrote: > Assuming there is rough consensus, I'll make this a pull request (see > https://github.com/gavinandresen/bitcoin-git/tree/relax_isstandard for code > changes). > > > > Now that we are finally starting to see the use of multi-signature a

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: relax the IsStandard rules for P2SH transactions

2014-06-17 Thread Peter Todd
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 03:40:36PM -0400, Gavin Andresen wrote: > Assuming there is rough consensus, I'll make this a pull request (see > https://github.com/gavinandresen/bitcoin-git/tree/relax_isstandard for code > changes). I'm also working on a very similar patch with some additional protection

[Bitcoin-development] Proposal: relax the IsStandard rules for P2SH transactions

2014-06-17 Thread Gavin Andresen
Assuming there is rough consensus, I'll make this a pull request (see https://github.com/gavinandresen/bitcoin-git/tree/relax_isstandard for code changes). Now that we are finally starting to see the use of multi-signature and other more complicated transaction forms in applications I think