Both wallet and server side implementations will be based on existing
code in me-friendly language (C++>Python>anything else). I don't have
a time for it right now but Crypto hackathon in Parallel Polis
(http://cryptohack.org/) seems like good opportunity for it. I will
let you know then.
2015-02-
If you decide to implement this in an existing or new bitcoinj based
wallet, then I'm happy to give you pointers on how to do it. Making
one-off, cross platform app specific wallets is pretty easy these days. For
2-of-3 dispute mediation transactions they'd start out being kind of
specialist so ask
I didn't consider that, thank you for feedback! I will try to find
some time for implementing it. I'll write again then.
2015-01-31 23:50 GMT+02:00 Gavin Andresen :
> I agree- standards should be descriptive ("here is how this thing I did
> works") and NOT proscriptive ("here's what I think will w
I agree- standards should be descriptive ("here is how this thing I did
works") and NOT proscriptive ("here's what I think will work, lets all try
to do it this way.").
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Mike Hearn wrote:
> I could look at implementing it someday, but now I'd like to receive
>> f
>
> I could look at implementing it someday, but now I'd like to receive
> feedback from community.
>
IMO it's better to pair a protocol spec with an implementation. For one, it
can show up issues in the design you didn't think of. For another,
implementation is a lot more work than speccing out a
I know about that wiki page. I just wanted to design protocol which
would make it easier in practice. (now it would be done manually)
I could look at implementing it someday, but now I'd like to receive
feedback from community.
2015-01-31 19:19 GMT+02:00 Mike Hearn :
> Hi Martin,
>
> You're on th
Hi Martin,
You're on the right lines. Your writeup is pretty similar to the high level
overview given here though:
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Contracts#Example_2:_Escrow_and_dispute_mediation
To make 2-of-3 dispute mediation works requires implementing a wallet that
supports it, and the tools me
Ooh, I had a very similar proposal, except it involved sharing generic P2SH
scripts. It also involved facilitating requesting of signatures.. We should
talk.On 31 Jan 2015 01:30, Martin Habovštiak
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I've been thinking about how to solve security problems of the servers
> h
Hello,
I've been thinking about how to solve security problems of the servers
holding huge amounts of bitcoins (exchanges, markets...) and came up
with this idea: https://gist.github.com/Kixunil/2ec79cf40a53fb899ac5
TL;DR: it's extension of BIP70 (but not fully compatible due to security
reasons)
9 matches
Mail list logo
