On Sunday, January 29, 2012 9:30:10 AM Gavin Andresen wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 6:19 AM, Amir Taaki wrote:
> > (oops sorry greg- replied to you by mistake)
> >
> > That address he gives is 77 characters/bytes (same thing). What I'm
> > asking is how can it be so small.
>
> That's an alter
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 6:19 AM, Amir Taaki wrote:
> (oops sorry greg- replied to you by mistake)
>
> That address he gives is 77 characters/bytes (same thing). What I'm asking
> is how can it be so small.
That's an alternative design for multisig addresses that would put a byte
giving the type
(oops sorry greg- replied to you by mistake)
That address he gives is 77 characters/bytes (same thing). What I'm asking is
how can it be so small. I know that it's encoding a script, but then I started
trying to imagine what kind of script and to me it seems that 2 public keys are
too large for
3 matches
Mail list logo
