On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 5:12 AM, wrote:
> You are right there is a bug in there.
>
> But the value is not 25% I think. Tinker some more. :-)
>
>>
>> Afaict, 3 is a perfectly valid value, meaning 25% of sig-> key recoveries
>> would fail erroneously...
Values 2 and 3 are only needed in theory. Th
You are right there is a bug in there.
But the value is not 25% I think. Tinker some more. :-)
> I think i see a bug:
>
> line 273 of key.cpp
>
> if (rec<0 || rec>=3)
> return false;
>
> Afaict, 3 is a perfectly valid value, meaning 25% of sig-> key recoveries
> would fail er
I think i see a bug:
line 273 of key.cpp
if (rec<0 || rec>=3)
return false;
Afaict, 3 is a perfectly valid value, meaning 25% of sig-> key recoveries
would fail erroneously...
--
Is your legacy SCM sy
3 matches
Mail list logo
