On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Mike Hearn wrote:
>> OP_CODESEPARATOR 14
>> OP_DEPTH 182
>
> I'm interested to see what scripts were using OP_DEPTH and
> OP_CODESEPARATOR, as the latter appears to be useless to my eyes.
>
> Could you give some tx ids which use unusual opcodes?
The OP_DEPTH are a
> OP_CODESEPARATOR 14
> OP_DEPTH 182
I'm interested to see what scripts were using OP_DEPTH and
OP_CODESEPARATOR, as the latter appears to be useless to my eyes.
Could you give some tx ids which use unusual opcodes?
--
L
Just run a query over the entire blockchain, looking at script opcode
use. I counted the number of times each opcode was used, in total:
https://gist.github.com/3180470
(data in full)
OP_0 104
OP_1 27
OP_2 12
OP_2OVER 182
OP_2SWAP 182
OP_3 16
OP_4 1
OP_CHECKMULTISIG 22
OP_CHECKSIG 12188693
OP_CODE
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 1:50 AM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Just run a query over the entire blockchain, looking at script opcode
> use. I counted the number of times each opcode was used, in total:
> https://gist.github.com/3180470
And here is the testnet3 data: https://gist.github.com/3180486
--
Je
4 matches
Mail list logo
