Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP38 Encrypted Address Discussion

2014-06-09 Thread Gregory Maxwell
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Richard Moore wrote: > Hey all again, > > I am implementing BIP38 wallets right now, and had another idea I would like > to put out there for discussion. > > Right now the scrypt pbkdf is (16384, 8, 8) for (N, r, p), but I was > wondering if it would make sense t

[Bitcoin-development] BIP38 Encrypted Address Discussion

2014-06-09 Thread Richard Moore
Hey all again, I am implementing BIP38 wallets right now, and had another idea I would like to put out there for discussion. Right now the scrypt pbkdf is (16384, 8, 8) for (N, r, p), but I was wondering if it would make sense to include an extra byte in the address which would encode the para