Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP 0020: URI Scheme

2012-01-28 Thread Andreas Schildbach
On 01/28/2012 02:45 AM, Luke-Jr wrote: > It's been implemented in many clients for nearly all 2011. > Bitcoin-Qt is just behind the pace. Not relevant. Bitcoin Wallet for Android implements only parts of this spec: The hexadecimal notations (x) and exponent notations (X) feel horribly redundant

Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP 0020: URI Scheme

2012-01-28 Thread Wladimir
I'd state it this way: a spec needs to be minimally complete The subset implemented by bitcoin-qt allows description of *all* currently desirable bitcoin transactions. The rest of the spec is simply other ways to describe the same = redundancy In case new transaction types are added, the spec ob

Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP 0020: URI Scheme

2012-01-27 Thread bitcoin-list
Luke-Jr wrote: >On Friday, January 27, 2012 7:36:31 PM bitcoin-l...@bluematt.me wrote: >> It was implemented in the waylaying client with the merge of >Bitcoin-Qt for >> drag and drop, and just recently for system URI handling in >> >https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/70f55355e29c8e45b60

Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP 0020: URI Scheme

2012-01-27 Thread Luke-Jr
On Friday, January 27, 2012 7:36:31 PM bitcoin-l...@bluematt.me wrote: > It was implemented in the waylaying client with the merge of Bitcoin-Qt for > drag and drop, and just recently for system URI handling in > https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/70f55355e29c8e45b607e782c5d76609 > d23cc858.

Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP 0020: URI Scheme

2012-01-27 Thread bitcoin-list
It was implemented in the waylaying client with the merge of Bitcoin-Qt for drag and drop, and just recently for system URI handling in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/70f55355e29c8e45b607e782c5d76609d23cc858. However the version on the wiki armed as BIP 20 has a ton of extraneous crap

Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP 0020: URI Scheme

2012-01-27 Thread Luke-Jr
On Friday, January 27, 2012 5:51:04 PM Amir Taaki wrote: > BIP 0020 is the old URI scheme BIPisized. > > ATM it is Draft status. It's been Final (even according to BIP 1 standards) since late January 2011. The only change recently is assigning it a BIP number for formality. > I do not know enou

[Bitcoin-development] BIP 0020: URI Scheme

2012-01-27 Thread Amir Taaki
BIP 0020 is the old URI scheme BIPisized. ATM it is Draft status. I do not know enough about the discussion back last year to know whether to move it to Accepted status or not. My feelings are that having a re-decision (even if it was accepted last year) is healthy since it makes no sense to ha