Re: [Bitcoin-development] All pre-BIP BIPs are not valid

2012-01-29 Thread Luke-Jr
On Sunday, January 29, 2012 6:02:30 PM Matt Corallo wrote: > I have to say, I agree with Luke here, this was Finalized a long time > ago. The version that was agreed on can be seen at > https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/BIP_0021 No, that never had a consensus. > Also see https://bitcointalk.org/index.p

Re: [Bitcoin-development] All pre-BIP BIPs are not valid

2012-01-29 Thread Matt Corallo
I have to say, I agree with Luke here, this was Finalized a long time ago. The version that was agreed on can be seen at https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/BIP_0021 Also see https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=6205.0 and Luke's three biased polls at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=6206.0 htt

Re: [Bitcoin-development] All pre-BIP BIPs are not valid

2012-01-29 Thread Luke-Jr
First and foremost, I consider this thread an utter waste of time. These matters were "finished" over a year ago, and there is no need to dig them up again just because there are numbers for BIPs now. I don't intend to continue this topic any further than necessary, since my time (and everyone e

[Bitcoin-development] All pre-BIP BIPs are not valid

2012-01-29 Thread Amir Taaki
Hi all, Luke Dashjr is telling me that BIP 20 was accepted as Final a year ago (before the BIP process existed). https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Bitcoin_Improvement_Proposals I respectfully disagree. I find it nonsensical to have a BIP to have been accepted before the BIP process existed. My feeli