losew...@gmail.com
losew...@gmail.com
--
"Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get
unparalleled scalability from t
On 25 May 2013 10:53, Luke-Jr wrote:
> On Saturday, May 25, 2013 8:25:35 AM Melvin Carvalho wrote:
> > It might be an idea to have 'rule change' fixes and 'bug fix' releases go
> > out separately
>
> Bitcoin is a consensus system. You can't run clients with different rules
> on
> the same blockch
On Saturday, May 25, 2013 8:25:35 AM Melvin Carvalho wrote:
> It might be an idea to have 'rule change' fixes and 'bug fix' releases go
> out separately
Bitcoin is a consensus system. You can't run clients with different rules on
the same blockchain/network - it just won't work! Maybe we're now t
On 25 May 2013 07:46, Zooko Wilcox-OHearn wrote:
> jgarzik wrote:
> > 1) Rule changes. We don't want these.
>
> In general? What constitutes a rule change?
>
> For example, if I understand correctly (from what Gavin said at
> Bitcoin 2013), there is a move afoot to lift the block size limit.
>
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 7:46 AM, Zooko Wilcox-OHearn <
zo...@leastauthority.com> wrote:
> jgarzik wrote:
> > 1) Rule changes. We don't want these.
>
> In general? What constitutes a rule change?
>
I'm sure he means rule changes with economical impact, such as miner block
reward, total number of
jgarzik wrote:
> 1) Rule changes. We don't want these.
In general? What constitutes a rule change?
For example, if I understand correctly (from what Gavin said at
Bitcoin 2013), there is a move afoot to lift the block size limit.
Although, when I went to confirm my understanding by reading the
6 matches
Mail list logo
