On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Matt Whitlock wrote:
> On Saturday, 29 March 2014, at 2:36 pm, Mike Hearn wrote:
>> Right - the explanation in the BIP about the board of directors is IMO a
>> little misleading. The problem is with splitting a private key is that at
>> some point, *someone* has
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 9:23 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 10:06 PM, Mike Koss wrote:
>> I've implemented an alternative to the BIP 32 proposal. I wanted a system
>> based on a hierarchical string representation (rather than hierarchy of
>> integers as BIP 32 proposes). For
After doing more thinking, what about letting a spend sign more information
associated with the transaction, such as a transaction ID provided by the
merchant? This seems to solve a lot of the problems being put forward, with
much less complexity.
---
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 7:52 PM, Luke-Jr wrote:
> Analysis, comments, constructive criticism, etc welcome for the following:
>
> ==Background==
> At present, an attacker can harm a pool by intentionally NOT submitting shares
> that are also valid blocks. All pools are vulnerable to this attack, whe
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Watson Ladd wrote:
>> Dear all,
>> I am proposing a new opcode for the purposes of anonymous
>> transactions. This new opcode enables scripts to be given proof that
>> the re
Dear all,
A draft of my paper is up at
http://wbl.github.com/bitcoinanon.pdf
Comments are welcome, as is discussion about implications I haven't thought of.
Sincerely,
Watson Ladd
--
Virtualization & Cloud M
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Watson Ladd wrote:
>> I am proposing a new opcode for the purposes of anonymous
>> transactions. This new opcode enables scripts to be given proof that
>> the receiver can carry out
Using
OP_CHECKEXPSIG we can instead pass the script that gives the nth note
value proof that the notes {1,...n-1} were turned in and are distinct.
This enables a coupling of the strong double spend protection of
Bitcoin with traditional digital cash's strong anonymity.
Sincerely,
W
8 matches
Mail list logo
