trivial) data-flow economy and compares it with the zero-reward situation
decades from now.
Its comparing two things that will never exist at the same time (unless
Bitcoin fails).
--
Thomas Zander
--
One dashboard fo
e line, its unacceptable behavior in any collaborative group.
Please be respectful and avoid ad-hominem attacks.
--
Thomas Zander
--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming! The Go Parallel Website,
sponsored b
On Sunday 28. December 2014 18.25.29 Mike Hearn wrote:
> Lately we have been bumping up against the limitations of DNS as a protocol
> for learning about the p2p network.
Can you explain further where limitations and problems were hit?
--
Thomas
out setting
> up a full node. But I'd like to know what storage, RAM and bandwidth
> resources are needed. I guess that the problem is not the CPU.
There is a stats script running on this node;
http://213.165.91.169/
more peoples opinions;
https:
On Tuesday 28. October 2014 22.44.50 Ferdinando M. Ametrano wrote:
> It amazes me that basic economic considerations seems completely lost here,
> especially when it comes to mining.
Please don't confuse people dismissing your thoughts with dismissing the basic
economic considerations. The fact o
On Monday 27. October 2014 19.26.48 Tom Harding wrote:
> Miner has to be very careful including a double-spend in his block -- he
> hopes:
How does it help the zero-confirmation to not include a payment? Doesn't that
just mean that if I send a double spend that neither of the payments will be
m
On Saturday 25. October 2014 13.27.30 Adam Back wrote:
> - alternatively you might say why not 1/100th reward reduction per 2
> week period rather than 1/2 every 4 years, a difficulty retarget could
> be a convenient point to do that.
mining equipment has a much shorter lifetime than 4 years, so t
On Saturday 25. October 2014 21.06.32 Alex Mizrahi wrote:
> If miner's income margin are less than 50% (which is a healthy situation
> when mining hardware is readily available), we might experience
> catastrophic loss of hashpower (and, more importantly, catastrophic loss of
> security) after rewa
On Sunday 19. October 2014 09.17.51 xor wrote:
> I joined the list when Bitcoin was already in the 10-billions of market
> capitalization, and it actually really surprised me how low the traffic is
> here given the importance of Bitcoin.
I gather that actual code changes to bitcoin-core and natu
th everyone that uses the standards properly.
Naturally, if an old version fails to function with Yahoo, I'm all for finding
a different provider. Thats what open platforms, like Mailman, are about.
--
Thomas Zander
--
process
was handled cleanly there is a very small chance of it being down-voted so an
actual vote may not be needed (its hard to decide who gets a vote..).
You obviously need a deadline for this and afterwards you mark the proposal
final. Or yo
ool == true)
else if (myBool == false)
and neither of them will hit.
> I
> would like to change BIP62 to also state that interpreted booleans
> must be of minimal encoded size (in addition to numbers).
What about rejecting a script where a bool is not explicitly
On Friday 10. October 2014 19.26.49 Mike Hearn wrote:
> I'm sure this suggestion will go down like a lead balloon, but Bitcoin Core
> is not the first project that's had issues with Linux distros silently
> modifying their software as they package it.
And so far its been near impossible for those
On Monday 15. September 2014 11.51.35 Matt Whitlock wrote:
> If you were merely attaching your public key to them, then the email server
> could have been systematically replacing your public key with some other
> public key,
The beauty of publicly archived mailinglists make it impossible to get
overnmental clearance of credential without in-person
> vetting. Ask them if they accept your behavioral signature.
>
> I know there is a lot of PGP hating these days but this comment doesn't
> necessarily apply to every situation.
> > On Sep 15, 2014, at 9:08 AM, Jeff
matter) key without seeing that
person in real life, verifying their identity etc.
I think that kind of disqualifies pgp for identity purposes wrt Satoshi :-)
--
Thomas Zander
--
Want excitement?
Manually upgrad
16 matches
Mail list logo
