.imgur.com/5Gfh9CW.png
>
> The max block size has clearly been in play for 8 months already.
>
>
>
> --
> ___
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitco
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸><(((º>
Richard Moore ~ Founder
Genetic Mistakes Software inc.
phone: (778) 882-
OP_VERIFY
Just something that came to mind while reading about OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY.
Thanks,
RicMoo
.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸><(((º>
Richard Moore ~ Founder
Genetic Mistakes Software inc.
phone: (778) 882-6125
email: ric...@geneticmistakes.com &l
:11 AM, Raúl Martínez wrote:
> Only messages between peers are encrypted, only during transit.
>
> Before sending a transaction to Node B you use his public key, so Node B has
> the key
>
> El 19/08/2014 17:05, "Richard Moore" escribió:
> If you encrypt all mes
have some interesting meaning?
Thanks again,
RicMoo
.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸><(((º>
Richard Moore ~ Founder
Genetic Mistakes Software inc.
phone: (778) 882-6125
email: ric...@geneticmistakes.com
www: http://GeneticMis
gt;= 0?
Thanks!
RicMoo
.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸><(((º>
Richard Moore ~ Founder
Genetic Mistakes Software inc.
phone: (778) 882-6125
email: ric...@geneticmistakes.com
www: http://GeneticMistakes.com
--
without being a generation transaction input?
.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸><(((º>
Richard Moore ~ Founder
Genetic Mistakes Software inc.
phone: (778) 882-6125
email: ric...@geneticmistakes.com
www: ht
lse fails, use “6A” for adaptive, or “6p”… But I
don’t really like polluting the namespace for a minor tweak.
Randomly,
RicMoo
.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸><(((º>
Richard Moore ~ Founder
Genetic Mistakes Software inc.
phone: (778) 882-6125
email: ric...@geneticmistakes.com
like that but this is what bitcoinj calls them).
>
> In practice when I look at performance issues with current SPV clients,
> getheaders speed is not on my radar.
.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸><(((º>
Richard
segment_count times faster.
Existing methods could be to use checkpoint-ish nodes or bootstrap data files,
but these begin relying on semi-cetralizenesses.
Ideas? Suggestions? Concerns? Prior it-ain’t-gonna-works?
Thanks!
RicMoo
.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸><(((º>
Rich
10 matches
Mail list logo