Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bug in 2-of-3 transaction signing in Bitcoind?

2014-04-15 Thread Mike Belshe
For what it is worth, I found btcd (the go implementation of bitcoind) has much better error/diagnostics messages. It would have given you more than "-22 TX Rejected". I used it to debug my own multi-sig transactions and it was very helpful. Mike On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 8:42 AM, Matt Whitlock

Re: [Bitcoin-development] New BIP32 structure

2014-03-26 Thread Mike Belshe
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Alan Reiner wrote: > This might be tangential, but the comment about "refund" chains reminded > me. Armory will be implementing multi-sig/linked wallets where a each > device has a parallel HDW branch and produces P2SH addresses. For those > types of wallets, I

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Testnet block explorer

2013-12-27 Thread Mike Belshe
Great! There is another one at http://testnet.btclook.com/ which provides a different view as well. Mike On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 10:05 AM, Mike Hearn wrote: > For a long time the only block explorer for testnet has been the original > blockexplorer.com, which is unfortunately often broken /

Re: [Bitcoin-development] [unSYSTEM] DarkWallet Best Practices

2013-12-19 Thread Mike Belshe
Hey Peter - I think this is a super list. A couple of thoughts: a) In the section on multi-sig and multi-factor, I think we can split these apart. Multi-factor user authentication is very valuable and not the same as multi-factor signing, which is a second level of complexity. The multi-facto

[Bitcoin-development] Testnet under attack?

2013-11-15 Thread Mike Belshe
It appears that someone is minting new blocks literally every couple of seconds on the testnet chain right now. You can see it on both blockexplorer: http://blockexplorer.com/testnet and also btclook: http://testnet.btclook.com/ Is this something we should worry about? thanks, Mike ---