Re: [Bitcoin-development] Linux packaging letter

2013-07-23 Thread Douglas Huff
Honestly, until I read the quoted part of your response, I actually wasn't in favor of this whole thing since in general the types of issues being mentioned are, in large part, the types of issues that maintainers deal with all the time. On Jul 23, 2013, at 3:02 PM, Scott Howard wrote: > Respo

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Please help sanity test: Linux/Windows 0.5.0rc2 binaries

2011-11-04 Thread Douglas Huff
What's wrong with the mac build? I just built on 10.7 without any issues. -- Douglas Huff On Nov 4, 2011, at 4:29 PM, Gavin Andresen wrote: > If you wonder where the bitcoin-0.5.0rc2-linux.tar.gz went... > > I removed it because it is not sane (we need to teach the Qt build t

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Mac libboost_thread or thread-mt?

2011-10-05 Thread Douglas Huff
Bad update. Macports has a couple of boost packages. Install the newer 1.46 ones. -- Douglas Huff On Oct 5, 2011 1:43 PM, "Gavin Andresen" wrote: > I updated src/makefile.osx and doc/build-osx.txt today, assuming that > the MacPorts versions of dependencies will be used a

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Request review: drop misbehaving peers

2011-09-15 Thread Douglas Huff
en't accepted. No reason to take that off list, it's an issue that's been acknowledged on irc numerous times and is in the public channel logs. -- Douglas Huff signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Request review: drop misbehaving peers

2011-09-15 Thread Douglas Huff
On Sep 15, 2011 11:20 AM, "Gavin Andresen" wrote: > I'm ignoring bandwidth DoS attacks-- we already have the > -maxreceivebuffer option to deal with those. I disagree with this comment. The way this is currently implemented is a mem exhaustion dos in itself waiting to happen and does nothing to p

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Project status

2011-09-13 Thread Douglas Huff
On Sep 13, 2011 11:40 AM, "Luke-Jr" wrote: > Once created, they must submit the > transaction to a staff member with the proper authority to bring it to the > offline transaction-signing wallet (on a USB key), where it is signed, and > returned to this third wallet. I agreed up to this point. Pri

Re: [Bitcoin-development] New standard transaction types: time to schedule a blockchain split?

2011-08-24 Thread Douglas Huff
On Aug 24, 2011 3:29 PM, "Gregory Maxwell" wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Christian Decker > wrote: > > we could add an rsa-like scheme which allows m-out-of-n signatures. It works > > by distributing shares of the key which are points on a curve having the > > actual key as 0-value.

Re: [Bitcoin-development] New standard transaction types: time to schedule a blockchain split?

2011-08-24 Thread Douglas Huff
On Aug 24, 2011 10:12 AM, "Gavin Andresen" wrote: > > If anybody has some open-source, patent-free, thoroughly-tested code > that already does DSA-key-splitting, speak up please. > If the caveat of a trusted third party is acceptable and, as greg mentioned, if there was a way to export unsigned t