combination of
https://github.com/blockchain/My-Wallet and
https://github.com/blockchain/My-Wallet-Integrity-Checker but I could see why
that might be more of an issue for the the official site.
Thank You,
Ben Reeves
On 9 Jul 2012, at 15:00, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 5:21
ll block height fix now?
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Ben Reeves wrote:
>> One more thing to add. The implementation in the reference patch fixes
>> the blockchain forking issue however by still allowing spent coinbases
>&g
restart and could cause problems for
new clients during the initial blockchain download.
Is there a reason not to disallow duplicate coinbases entirely?
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Ben Reeves wrote:
> Yes you are right. Any fix in DisconnectBlock() has the same potential issues.
>
>
also might be prudent to have a blockchain repair script ready,
which checks the db for missing coinbase transactions and downloads
them from another peer or block explorer if necessary.
Thank You,
Ben Reeves
www.blockchain.info
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:45 PM, Pieter Wuille wrote:
> On Wed, Feb
I'm not sure. What if they use a coinbase of a block that has already matured?
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 10:46 PM, Gavin Andresen
wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Ben Reeves wrote:
>> A malicious miner can produce a duplicate coinbase which the majority
>> of clients
e attacker
only one valid block ~$240) and could be quite disruptive. I think
this should be patched in DisconnectBlock() (if it hasn't already?)
before any protocol change - maybe a new mapByCoinbase multimap is
needed.
Thank You,
Ben Reeves
www.blockchain.info
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 4:48 PM,
nts to find a genuine non-corrupted copy of the blockchain to download.
Thank You,
Ben Reeves
www.blockchain.info
On 28 Feb 2012, at 18:23, Luke-Jr wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 28, 2012 11:48:39 AM Pieter Wuille wrote:
>> A simple way to fix this, is adding an extra protocol rule[1]:
&g
Hi everyone,
I wish to submit the following draft BIP for discussion and possible
formal BIP review.
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/BIP_M_of_2_DRAFT
It is a proposed alternative to BIP 16 ("/P2SH/").
Thank you,
8 matches
Mail list logo
