On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Oliver Egginger wrote:
> Sorry for the off-topic but while reading this I like to ask you for
> picocoin, see:
>
> https://github.com/jgarzik/picocoin
>
> For a research project I'm looking for a C library to operate some block
> chain analysis (parsing raw blocks
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Wladimir wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Mem Wallet wrote:
>
>> Is there an intention that the various internal libraries could/should
>> be strengthened and heirachicalized such that they would be suitable for
>> 3rd party development of bitcoin relate
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Flavien Charlon
wrote:
>> This breaks existing invariants and would make the coins potentially less
>> fungible because they wouldn't be reorg safe.
>
> I'm not sure coins are ever reorg safe. All it takes is a double spend in
> the history of your coins for them
> This breaks existing invariants and would make the coins potentially less
fungible because they wouldn't be reorg safe.
I'm not sure coins are ever reorg safe. All it takes is a double spend in
the history of your coins for them to become invalid after a reorg. Because
of that, there are already
4 matches
Mail list logo
