Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP process

2014-10-19 Thread odinn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Earlier in the discussion I suggested Discourse so that the BIP page would be able to look smoother and draw more input. Unsystem forum is run on Discourse and has twitter, github, and e-mail integration. For those who haven't explored it, here is wh

Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP process

2014-10-19 Thread Thomas Zander
On Sunday 19. October 2014 09.17.51 xor wrote: > I joined the list when Bitcoin was already in the 10-billions of market > capitalization, and it actually really surprised me how low the traffic is > here given the importance of Bitcoin. I gather that actual code changes to bitcoin-core and natu

Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP process

2014-10-19 Thread Wladimir
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 9:17 AM, xor wrote: > So as a random stranger to the project, I would vote against that if I was > allowed to. There really should be *more* discussion here, and splitting the > list up won't help with that. The problem is not one of traffic, but of confusion of concerns,

Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP process

2014-10-19 Thread Btc Drak
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 8:17 AM, xor wrote: > I joined the list when Bitcoin was already in the 10-billions of market > capitalization, and it actually really surprised me how low the traffic is > here > given the importance of Bitcoin. > > So as a random stranger to the project, I would vote aga

Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP process

2014-10-19 Thread xor
On Wednesday, October 15, 2014 10:29:43 AM Wladimir wrote: > B) I also think it makes sense to move the BIP discussion (both about > the BIP process and individual BIPs) to a separate mailing list. > > bitcoin-development currently has a dual function: discussion of > Bitcoin Core implementation c