I believe the requests Jeff is seeing came from my crawler although anyone
could be running it (https://github.com/ayeowch/bitnodes) since there is no
IP address in the log to confirm the source of the requests.
This is a sample log of an actual request from my crawler at 148.251.238.178
:
*2014-0
Hi Everyone,
The Armory team is pleased to announce the official release of our
decentralized multi-signature interface, called "Lockboxes". It is a
"true" multi-signature transaction interface:
* Decentralized multi-sig (no third-party servers or signers needed)
* Any multi-sig from 1-of-2
I am also seeing these quite bit on my p2pool box.
Right now it is just a bit of (mostly) harmless spam but in the future I
can see this kind of thing being used in DDOS attacks and "deep scans" to
gather information to be used to harm the bitcoin network. We could easily
block them but then they
At least my crawler (bitcoin-seeder:0.01) software shouldn't reconnect
more frequently than once every 15 minutes. But maybe the two
connections you saw were instances?
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Wladimir wrote:
>> The version message helpfully tells me my own IP address but not theirs ;p
>
> The version message helpfully tells me my own IP address but not theirs ;p
Try -logips. Logging peer IPs was disabled by default after #3764.
BTW I'm seeing the same abusive behavior. Who is running these? Why do
the requests need to be so frequent?
Wladimir
--
Seeing this on one of my public nodes:
2014-07-30 13:13:26 receive version message:
/getaddr.bitnodes.io:0.1/: version 70001, blocks=313169,
us=162.219.2.72:8333, peer=11847
2014-07-30 13:13:33 receive version message:
/getaddr.bitnodes.io:0.1/: version 70001, blocks=29,
us=162.219.2.72:8333, p
That would definitely be a new BIP.
But firstly it'd make sense to implement it and make sure that the payment
processors intend to use it. Like I said, I wasn't very successful so far
in getting them to make useful memo fields. I'm hoping that once wallets
start actually recording and displaying
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 12:32 AM, Caleb Roger Davis wrote:
> I have several Bitcoin contributions I would like to make, mostly for
> learning purposes to get started:
>
> I would like to contribute to unit and/or other types of tests (code), not
> production code.
Low-level unit tests are in `src
Are you aware of bitcoinj?
http://bitcoinj.github.io/
It contains everything to plug together a basic SPV wallet and runs in
the JVM.
On 07/30/2014 09:38 AM, Caleb Roger Davis wrote:
> Yes, I was thinking something on the JVM, I have a big interest in
> Clojure right now (am a long time Java de
On 28 Jul 2014, at 15:32 , Mike Hearn wrote:
> So what now? To be honest my next priority with BIP70 was to formalise the
> extensions process, I've been dragging my feet over that because I'm working
> on other things. And then after that to knock some heads together over at
> BitPay/Coinbase
Yes, I was thinking something on the JVM, I have a big interest in Clojure
right now (am a long time Java dev, since 1996).
I do not know if I want to tackle writing bitcoin in Clojure, but I want to
create a tool kit first to learn more about how it works.
Caleb
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 5:12 PM
11 matches
Mail list logo
