On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 9:45 AM, Wladimir wrote:
> Talking about complete, BIP 40 and 41 don't even have an associated
> document:
> https://github.com/bitcoin/bips
> I agree that was over-eager number assigning.
Maybe! The subject matter its assigned for is already _widely_
deployed, for better
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 8:53 AM, Drak wrote:
> > It's quite normal for standards bodies to allocate numbers when in draft
> > status. If they don't pass, they don't pass - they are clearly labelled
> > DRAFTs.
> >
> > +1 on having things
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 6:06 PM, Peter Todd wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 05:32:55PM +0100, Wladimir wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >
> > > BIP drafts are stored in git://github.com/bitcoin/bips.git/drafts/ and
> > > are not automatically assigned a BIPS numb
On 19 November 2013 17:01, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 8:53 AM, Drak wrote:
> > It's quite normal for standards bodies to allocate numbers when in draft
> > status. If they don't pass, they don't pass - they are clearly labelled
> > DRAFTs.
> >
> > +1 on having things in a g
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 05:32:55PM +0100, Wladimir wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> > BIP drafts are stored in git://github.com/bitcoin/bips.git/drafts/ and
> > are not automatically assigned a BIPS number.
> >
>
> Are we going to move ahead with this?
>
> If so,
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 8:53 AM, Drak wrote:
> It's quite normal for standards bodies to allocate numbers when in draft
> status. If they don't pass, they don't pass - they are clearly labelled
> DRAFTs.
>
> +1 on having things in a github repository. Much better for collaboration,
The IETF makes
On 19 November 2013 16:32, Wladimir wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
>> BIP drafts are stored in git://github.com/bitcoin/bips.git/drafts/ and
>> are not automatically assigned a BIPS number.
>>
>
> Are we going to move ahead with this?
>
> If so, I'm volunteering
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> BIP drafts are stored in git://github.com/bitcoin/bips.git/drafts/ and
> are not automatically assigned a BIPS number.
>
Are we going to move ahead with this?
If so, I'm volunteering to create the repository and import the current
BIPs from
In the design of Bitcoin mining serves two fundemental purposes:
proof-of-publication and order consensus. Bitcoin's design entangles
these fundemental purposes with other goals, such as validation and
initial coin distribution. This leads to a design that is fundementally
unscalable, albeit effec
9 matches
Mail list logo
