Hello,
Has everyone seen
http://www.coindesk.com/bitcoin-gaining-market-based-legitimacy-xbt/
Bitcoin has its own ISO currency code.
Ron
--
LIMITED TIME SALE - Full Year of Micros
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Also somewhat related, I have been looking for some time now to
abstract out the UTXO and block databases so that a variety of
key/value stores could be used as a backend, configured by a command
line parameter. In particular, it would be interesting f
On 9/17/13, Mike Hearn wrote:
> Nobody has written code to use a better format, migrate old wallets, etc.
ACK, thanks.
--
LIMITED TIME SALE - Full Year of Microsoft Training For Just $49.99!
1,500+ hours of tutorials inc
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 4:00 AM, Mike Hearn wrote:
> LevelDB is fast - very fast if you give it enough CPU time and disk seeks.
> But it's not the last word in performance.
I'd looked at the hyperleveldb, but their performance graphs made it
seem like it would be slower for the actual database si
Thanks Mike.
I definitely took all your comments to heart, but we're looking to road-test
something quickly for the sake of user experience in our own wallet. I wouldn't
mind us contributing to a BIP once we have a better grip on the payment
protocol itself, but (for example) I'm still not sure
The payment protocol doesn't *require* signed certificates, it just gives
the option of using them.
However if you don't have some kind of cryptographic proof of identity,
what stops me putting your name and face into my payment requests and
claiming to be you?
Only slightly related to this...
What's the reason why BerkleyDB is maintained for the wallet?
I think it would be a good thing to get rid of the libdb4.8++-dev
dependency that makes bitcoind harder to compile on debian and ubuntu.
Unless, of course, there's a reason I am missing...
On 9/17/13, M
Nobody has written code to use a better format, migrate old wallets, etc.
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Jorge Timón wrote:
> Only slightly related to this...
> What's the reason why BerkleyDB is maintained for the wallet?
> I think it would be a good thing to get rid of the libdb4.8++-dev
>
LevelDB is fast - very fast if you give it enough CPU time and disk seeks.
But it's not the last word in performance.
HyperLevelDB is a forked LevelDB with some changes, mostly, finer grained
locking and changes to how compaction works:
http://hyperdex.org/performance/leveldb/
However, it comes
I've been hard at work completing an open source Ruby gem library (called
MoneyTree) that implements Hierarchical Deterministic Bitcoin wallets
(BIP32), and it's about ready for release. It passes all of the test
vectors and has 100% code coverage. I've also written an extensive README
which goes i
You can prove ownership of a private key by signing a challenger-generated
nonce with the public part and giving the signature back to the challenger
- same as with any asymmetric crypto system.
As I already noted, the payment protocol is designed to solve that problem.
You could design a BIP that
Couple of things I just thought about:
1- Presume server should only sweep with two (or more, see below) revocation
certificates being present
2- Need to insert something in the flow so that Alice can verify that the
uploaded key is actually Bob's (and perhaps vise-versa, given an extremely
ded
12 matches
Mail list logo
