On Wednesday 01 May 2013 15:26:57 Jeff Garzik wrote:
> A generalized HTTP REST query protocol would be a nice addition... it
> is just off-topic for this thread. On IRC yesterday, we discussed an
> HTTP query interface like you suggested. It was agreed that it was a
> nice interface, and might b
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 10:05 AM, Andy Parkins wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 April 2013 21:11:47 Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
>> Hardly. The storage format is bitcoin protocol wire format, plus a
>> tiny header. It is supported in multiple applications already, and is
>> the most efficient storage format for bi
On Tuesday 30 April 2013 21:11:47 Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Hardly. The storage format is bitcoin protocol wire format, plus a
> tiny header. It is supported in multiple applications already, and is
> the most efficient storage format for bitcoin protocol blocks.
"Most efficient" for what purpose?
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Pieter Wuille wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I think it is time to move forward with pruning nodes, i.e. nodes that fully
> validate and relay blocks and transactions, but which do not keep (all)
> historic blocks around, and thus cannot be queried for these.
>
> The big
4 matches
Mail list logo
