On 4/10/13, Peter Todd wrote:
> Oh, and while we're at it, long-term (hard-fork) it'd be good to change
> the tx hash algorithm to extend the merkle tree into the txouts/txins
> itself, which means that to prove a given txout exists you only need to
> provide it, rather than the full tx.
>
> Curre
The key in the message was used in my last announcement, so that
establishes continuity there.
But regardless, all mails I send are signed automatically by Gmail using
either the gmail.com consumer key (for my posts to this list) or the
google.com corporate key (for my posts to the bitcoinj lists)
On Tuesday 09 April 2013 22:03:35 Mike Hearn wrote:
> To get bitcoinj 0.8, check out our source from git and then run *git fetch
> --all; git checkout **cbbb1a2bf4d1*. This will place you on the 0.8 release
> in a secure manner. This message was written on Tuesday 9th April 2013 and
Not quite sec
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 12:15:26AM -0700, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 11:53 PM, Peter Todd wrote:
> > Of course, either way you have the odd side-effect that it's now
> > difficult to pay further funds to a random txout seen on the
> > blockchain... strange, although possibly n
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 11:53 PM, Peter Todd wrote:
> Of course, either way you have the odd side-effect that it's now
> difficult to pay further funds to a random txout seen on the
> blockchain... strange, although possibly not a bad thing.
Oh wow, thats actually a quite good thing— it's a proper
5 matches
Mail list logo
