I like that idea. I'm close to having something working along those lines.
Hopefully I'll be able to push something by tonight.
>
> How about a rpc like "usewallet " that simply
> generalizes all the rpcs?
>
> And instead of explicitly deactivating rpcs that don't make sense,
> simply have th
The more I think about this topic, the more I think the first task at hand
is to implement secure, private messaging...the nature of any messages
(payment requests or otherwise) sent between wallets is such that it needs
to be secured. And the great thing is that it's easy to do and you don't
need
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 3:53 AM, Eric Lombrozo wrote:
> I started working on a new feature to allow for watch-only addresses in
> wallets. https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/2121
>
> In order to integrate this feature nicely into bitcoin / bitcoin, it will be
> necessary to disable signing an
I started working on a new feature to allow for watch-only addresses in
wallets. https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/2121
In order to integrate this feature nicely into bitcoin / bitcoin, it will be
necessary to disable signing and privkey export operations for watch-only
addresses. Since d
4 matches
Mail list logo
