On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Matthew Mitchell
wrote:
> You wouldn't need to pipeline the requests, just place more than one
> inventory vector in get data, right? Well my messages would save the space of
> those inventory vectors. Instead of needing 36 byte inventory vectors for
> each tran
On 11 Sep 2012, at 20:42, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> Someone can do that just by pipelining the one at a time requests.
> How much bandwidth do you think you could save over that?
You wouldn't need to pipeline the requests, just place more than one inventory
vector in get data, right? Well my mes
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Matthew Mitchell
wrote:
> For some reason sourceforge is not sending me updates anymore but I can see
> the replies online…
>
> There could be a slightly more simple protocol which gives all the
> transactions hashes and nodes can then download the transactions s
For some reason sourceforge is not sending me updates anymore but I can see the
replies online…
There could be a slightly more simple protocol which gives all the transactions
hashes and nodes can then download the transactions separately. However there
are two problems:
1. Downloading all the
4 matches
Mail list logo
