On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Amir Taaki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> luke-jr wants me to split this BIP into 3 separate BIPs because he says that
> other devs felt it was too unfocused and covered too many topics. However
> this discussion took place on IRC, a
It actually took place on this list:
http:
On Monday, July 30, 2012 8:26:12 PM Amir Taaki wrote:
> https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/BIP_0022
Note that the Pooled Mining parts have already been moved to:
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/BIP_GMPPM
It just needs a number assigned (as the last part).
-
Hi,
luke-jr wants me to split this BIP into 3 separate BIPs because he says that
other devs felt it was too unfocused and covered too many topics. However this
discussion took place on IRC, and I never saw any of it to ascertain what
happened (BIP 1 says drafts should be evaluated on the mailin
Yep, I want to chip in and also express my gratitude for these useful tests. I
sent a personal email to Gavin before.
I plan to make some more complex tests by combining several of the simpler ones.
- Original Message -
From: Gavin Andresen
To: Stefan Thomas
Cc: bitcoin-development@l
I'd like to see the binaries signed with gpg, independent of any signatures
required for various operating systems.
I can't imagine a worse scenario than the bitcoin.org site being hacked and
the binaries replaced with wallet-stealing code. All of the developers seem
to have gpg keys, how hard can
5 matches
Mail list logo
