Just run a query over the entire blockchain, looking at script opcode
use. I counted the number of times each opcode was used, in total:
https://gist.github.com/3180470
(data in full)
OP_0 104
OP_1 27
OP_2 12
OP_2OVER 182
OP_2SWAP 182
OP_3 16
OP_4 1
OP_CHECKMULTISIG 22
OP_CHECKSIG 12188693
OP_CODE
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 1:50 AM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Just run a query over the entire blockchain, looking at script opcode
> use. I counted the number of times each opcode was used, in total:
> https://gist.github.com/3180470
And here is the testnet3 data: https://gist.github.com/3180486
--
Je
On 25/07/2012 10:45, Michael Grønager wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> I see dramatic differences in performance on virtual machines vs
> running directly on the iron. I am not an expert in virtual
> machines,
They can be, it depends on how they are set up. For reference, these
VM's used to test network
Hi Steve,
I see dramatic differences in performance on virtual machines vs running
directly on the iron. I am not an expert in virtual machines, but it seems to
me that they are weak when it comes to disk i/o. And berkeley DB, as used by
bitcoin is a sucker for disk i/o. In top I easily hit >1/
4 matches
Mail list logo
