On Monday, June 04, 2012 1:43:42 AM Peter Vessenes wrote:
> Does it have asymmetric payoff for an attacker, that is, over time does it
> pay them more to spend their hashes attacking than just mining?
That depends on the pool's reward scheme. Some complicated forms are capable
of getting "bonus"
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 8:52 PM, Luke-Jr wrote:
> Analysis, comments, constructive criticism, etc welcome for the following:
>
> ==Background==
> At present, an attacker can harm a pool by intentionally NOT submitting
> shares
> that are also valid blocks. All pools are vulnerable to this attack,
Yeah, for actually storing transactions the approach Satoshi uses of
relying on a database engine makes sense and is what the code already does,
so I'm not sure why this is a problem.
The real problem with Satoshis code for scaling down to smaller devices
(and one day desktops too) is the need to
3 matches
Mail list logo
