Re: [Bitcoin-development] Adding callback hooks to the satoshi client

2012-03-21 Thread bitcoin-list
You might also want to check out libcoin. Its a fork of the satoshi client: https://github.com/ceptacle/libcoin Matt Eric Lombrozo wrote: Hey, guys. I've been writing a number of apps that require realtime event notifications, where the JSON-RPC API clearly doesn't suffice. There are two app

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Adding callback hooks to the satoshi client

2012-03-21 Thread Matt Corallo
I spent some time changing the internal bitcoin code to use callback hooks, but its far from complete (or even really usable from anything other than the code in the satoshi client itself, it doesnt even have any deregister methods!). As it sits now, it is likely to get more eyeballs and merged fo

[Bitcoin-development] Adding callback hooks to the satoshi client

2012-03-21 Thread Eric Lombrozo
Hey, guys. I've been writing a number of apps that require realtime event notifications, where the JSON-RPC API clearly doesn't suffice. There are two approaches I've been taking to this end: 1) Writing my own library for dealing with raw bitcoin structures and connecting to bitcoin nodes via th

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal for a new opcode

2012-03-21 Thread Gregory Maxwell
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Watson Ladd wrote: > -My protocol works, your's doesn't. It's not enough to have a mix, the > mix needs to be verifiable to avoid > one of the mixers inserting their own key and removing a key that > should be in there. That doesn't mean you can't make your protoco

[Bitcoin-development] Proposal for a new opcode

2012-03-21 Thread Watson Ladd
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote: > On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Watson Ladd wrote: >> Dear all, >> I am proposing a new opcode for the purposes of anonymous >> transactions. This new opcode enables scripts to be given proof that >> the receiver can carry out or has carri

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Fwd: Proposal for a new opcode

2012-03-21 Thread Gregory Maxwell
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Watson Ladd wrote: > Dear all, > I am proposing a new opcode for the purposes of anonymous > transactions. This new opcode enables scripts to be given proof that > the receiver can carry out or has carried out a previous transaction. > I'm currently working on a pap