Re: [Bitcoin-development] Fwd: Proposal for a new opcode

2012-03-06 Thread Watson Ladd
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote: > On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Watson Ladd wrote: >> I am proposing a new opcode for the purposes of anonymous >> transactions. This new opcode enables scripts to be given proof that >> the receiver can carry out or has carried out a previ

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Fwd: Proposal for a new opcode

2012-03-06 Thread Gregory Maxwell
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Watson Ladd wrote: > I am proposing a new opcode for the purposes of anonymous > transactions. This new opcode enables scripts to be given proof that > the receiver can carry out or has carried out a previous transaction. > I'm currently working on a paper that disc

Re: [Bitcoin-development] P2SH status update

2012-03-06 Thread Luke-Jr
On Tuesday, March 06, 2012 12:34:15 PM slush wrote: > is there any status update from Deepbit? Why he still does not support > anything... I think nobody has discussed P2SH with Tycho recently, since the priority is to get BIP 30 deployed first. --

Re: [Bitcoin-development] P2SH status update

2012-03-06 Thread slush
Hi, is there any status update from Deepbit? Why he still does not support anything... slush On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Luke-Jr wrote: > BIP16: 37% support vs 4% oppose > BIP17:  4% support vs 0% oppose > > -- > Ke

[Bitcoin-development] P2SH status update

2012-03-06 Thread Luke-Jr
BIP16: 37% support vs 4% oppose BIP17: 4% support vs 0% oppose -- Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio,