On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 4:52 AM, Aidan Thornton wrote:
> I think that tag's in
> https://gitorious.org/+bitcoin-stable-developers/bitcoin/bitcoind-stable
> - a certain amount of developer politics seems to be involved, and
> v0.5.2 may not have been pushed to the official github repository.
No dev
Hi Aidan,
Thanks, and the number is still 140700 - do we have a policy / logic on adding
new checkpoints ? It seems to me that the number could easily be bumped to
16 by now ?
Cheers,
Michael
On 03/02/2012, at 10:52, Aidan Thornton wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Michael Grønag
> Hello Michael,
>
> I'm impressed by your refactorings, and hope some of them can make it into
> the Satoshi codebase.
Thanks:)
> I am however not sure what you've said above is safe. In particular, how do
> you guarantee that no other thread modifies the blockchain structure while
> you ar
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Michael Grønager wrote:
> Hi Gavin, others?
>
> I am trying to redo the performance test of the libcoin client against the
> 0.5.2 Satoshi client, that I have learned also have received quite some
> improvements in speed since 0.4.0 (e.g. from not verifying signat
Hi Gavin, others?
I am trying to redo the performance test of the libcoin client against the
0.5.2 Satoshi client, that I have learned also have received quite some
improvements in speed since 0.4.0 (e.g. from not verifying signatures on early
blocks).
However, I cannot find any tag with v0.5.
5 matches
Mail list logo
