Re: [Bitcoin-development] Alternative to OP_EVAL

2011-12-30 Thread roconnor
On Sat, 31 Dec 2011, Chris Double wrote: On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 5:42 AM, wrote: Basically OP_DUP lets you duplicate the code on the stack and that is the key to looping.  I'm pretty sure from here we get get Turing completeness. Using the stack operations I expect you can implement the SK-ca

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Alternative to OP_EVAL

2011-12-30 Thread Chris Double
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 5:42 AM, wrote: > Basically OP_DUP lets you duplicate the code on the stack and that is the > key to looping.  I'm pretty sure from here we get get Turing completeness. > Using the stack operations I expect you can implement the SK-calculus > given an OP_EVAL that allows a

Re: [Bitcoin-development] upnp isnt working

2011-12-30 Thread Matt Corallo
On Fri, 2011-12-30 at 00:57 -0800, Amir Taaki wrote: > hey, > > so sipa/gmaxwell proposed on irc that maybe upnp is not working anymore but > there isnt any way to test. > > well i made an alternate chain, and ran the daemon on my vps. > > sometimes it accepts connections, sometimes not. It's a

[Bitcoin-development] upnp isnt working

2011-12-30 Thread Amir Taaki
hey, so sipa/gmaxwell proposed on irc that maybe upnp is not working anymore but there isnt any way to test. well i made an alternate chain, and ran the daemon on my vps. sometimes it accepts connections, sometimes not. It's all very patchy. anyway just putting this out there ---