> It's not future. It's presently allowed in blocks. Which means it's perfectly
> valid to relay (and also perfectly value to NOT relay or accept). Ergo,
> shouldn't be punished.
You're absolutely right.
And you're right about the 99 confirmations, too-- I was thinking
blocks again, not transacti
On Monday, September 26, 2011 5:53 PM, "Luke-Jr" wrote:
> It's not future. It's presently allowed in blocks. Which means it's
> perfectly valid to relay (and also perfectly value to NOT relay or
> accept). Ergo, shouldn't be punished.
Yeah, my node has always relayed these transactions. The limit
On Monday, September 26, 2011 5:38:41 PM Gavin Andresen wrote:
> > The first one I was referring to is a *transaction* with "non-standard"
> > sig op count, which is AFAIK allowed in blocks, just not accepted by the
> > mainline rules.
>
> I sit corrected. The context is:
> // Checking ECDSA s
> The first one I was referring to is a *transaction* with "non-standard" sig op
> count, which is AFAIK allowed in blocks, just not accepted by the mainline
> rules.
I sit corrected. The context is:
// Checking ECDSA signatures is a CPU bottleneck, so to avoid
denial-of-service
// attacks
On Monday, September 26, 2011 4:47:06 PM Gavin Andresen wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Luke-Jr wrote:
> > +return DoS(10, error("AcceptToMemoryPool() : transaction with
> > out-of- bounds SigOpCount"));
> > +return DoS(10, error("ConnectInputs() : tried t
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Luke-Jr wrote:
> + return DoS(10, error("AcceptToMemoryPool() : transaction with out-of-
> bounds SigOpCount"));
> + return DoS(10, error("ConnectInputs() : tried to
> spend coinbase at depth %d", pindexBlock->nHeight - pindex->nHeight
Hey,
I'd like to simplify the internal reference miner and remove all
dependencies on cryptopp (it's the only place we use cryptopp instead of
OpenSSL).
Unfortunately, cryptopp is also used to calculate getwork "midstate".
This field is redundant and the miner could easily calculate it from the
b
* 6b8a5ab Bump version to 0.4.1
This should be some pre-0.5.0, not 0.4.1 which will be the stable team's first
release...
--
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of c
+return DoS(10, error("AcceptToMemoryPool() : transaction with out-of-
bounds SigOpCount"));
+return DoS(10, error("ConnectInputs() : tried to
spend coinbase at depth %d", pindexBlock->nHeight - pindex->nHeight));
+return DoS(10, error("AcceptBlock() : prev
9 matches
Mail list logo
