Re: [Bitcoin-development] 0.4rc1 known bugs

2011-09-03 Thread Matt Corallo
On Sat, 2011-09-03 at 20:13 -0400, Gavin Andresen wrote: > Quick status update on 0.4; I probably won't have time to tackle these > properly before Tuesday: > > + sipa found what looks like a deadlock between the addr-handling and > IRC-join-handling code. > + UukGoblin reports a deadlock problem

[Bitcoin-development] 0.4rc1 known bugs

2011-09-03 Thread Gavin Andresen
Quick status update on 0.4; I probably won't have time to tackle these properly before Tuesday: + sipa found what looks like a deadlock between the addr-handling and IRC-join-handling code. + UukGoblin reports a deadlock problem on a bitcoind handling getwork requests. If you want to get more fam

[Bitcoin-development] Last try: Fixes for 0.4

2011-09-03 Thread Luke-Jr
Once more before I just give up on trying... These branches fix bugs still remaining in 0.4rc1: - bugfix_getwork_newblk_race - getwork_dedupe - boost_fs3 - gitignore Additionally, this branch adds a tolerance to human error typing in base58 with ambiguous symbols, and should be very safe to merg

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Transaction limit size in CWallet::CreateTransaction

2011-09-03 Thread Chris Double
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 1:52 AM, Chris Double wrote: > So was the intent to use the CWalletTxn size, and the casting is > superfluous, or was it supposed to be the CTransaction* portion and > the cast is an incorrect way of doing that? Or am I suffering from > late night programmer syndrome and rea

[Bitcoin-development] Transaction limit size in CWallet::CreateTransaction

2011-09-03 Thread Chris Double
In CWallet::CreateTransaction there is a call to 'GetSerializeSize' on line 979 (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/wallet.cpp#L979). It looks like: -8<-- unsigned int nBytes = ::GetSerializeSize(*(CTransaction*)&wtxNew, SER_NETWORK) if (nBytes >= MAX_BLOCK_SIZE_GEN

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Version 0.4 release candidate 1

2011-09-03 Thread John Smith
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 8:12 PM, Gavin Andresen wrote: > Bitcoin version 0.4 release candidate 1 is ready for initial testing; > please grab the source from github and try to break it. > > The big, visible change is wallet private key encryption, which is NOT > turned on by default. > > The big, in

Re: [Bitcoin-development] BitCoin and MinorFs/AppArmor

2011-09-03 Thread John Smith
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Rob Meijer wrote: > Given that there was not a single response to my post, I gather there is > no to little interest in an updated MinorFs that could be used by bitcoin > on systems that support AppArmor (Ubuntu and OpenSuse). > Oh yes there is interest. I meant t