Re: [bitcoin-dev] Minimizing the redundancy in Golomb Coded Sets

2018-05-29 Thread Lucas Ontivero via bitcoin-dev
Hi Jim, Yes please, could you share CSV? We are developing a Wallet that uses Golomb-Rice filters it would help a lot for determine the best P value depending on the estimated number of elements the client needs to watch. 2018-05-29 19:38 GMT-03:00 Jim Posen via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.li

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Non-equal value CoinJoins. Opinions.

2019-12-29 Thread Lucas Ontivero via bitcoin-dev
This idea is not similar to the one in the knapsack paper because this one is based only in the computational complexity of finding partitions that match the outputs. However, and except in rare cases, there is only one valid partition (solution) for each output, it doesn't introduce any ambiguity.

Re: [bitcoin-dev] A BIP proposal for segwit addresses

2017-03-29 Thread Lucas Ontivero via bitcoin-dev
I don't know if i should response to this mail list or make a comment in commit file ( https://github.com/sipa/bech32/commit/52b5a0fa6d3174c4150393fb7d6b58d34b4f5e0b#diff-d23a42e5c904045098e8f8b1189f481e ) * Motivation: Here I think it could worth to mention that 58 requires mathematical operatio

Re: [bitcoin-dev] PayJoin adoption

2021-01-18 Thread Lucas Ontivero via bitcoin-dev
Hi Before all, thanks for the wiki page tracking the payjoin adoption, it is a good idea. - Even when there is a reasonable economical incentive to use segwit transactions to save fees a big percentage of the transactions are not using segwit yet. In the case of payjoins the economic incenti

Re: [bitcoin-dev] A proposal for Full RBF to not exclude Zero Conf use case

2022-12-13 Thread Lucas Ontivero via bitcoin-dev
Some wallets like Electrum would be affected by that because they use RBF to batch transactions so, outputs cannot be exactly the same as before. On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 10:09 AM Daniel Lipshitz via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > I dont think there was anything tech

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Coinjoin with less steps using ALL|ANYONECANPAY

2023-05-23 Thread Lucas Ontivero via bitcoin-dev
Hi all, In some coinjoin implementations inputs are registered first because in that way, if the user fails or refuses to sign the transaction the input is banned and denial of service is made a bit more expensive, in the sense that an attacker needs more and more utxos to keep the attack going.

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Parameters in BIP21 URIs

2023-09-10 Thread Lucas Ontivero via bitcoin-dev
Kiminuo, this was discussed here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/49 On Fri, Sep 8, 2023 at 2:39 PM kiminuo via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > [Formatted version of this post is here: > https://gist.github.com/kiminuo/cc2f19a4c5319e439fc7be8cbe5a39f9] > > Hi a