Re: [bitcoin-dev] Refreshed BIP324

2023-02-20 Thread Pieter Wuille via bitcoin-dev
On Sunday, February 19th, 2023 at 6:56 PM, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 10:13:05PM +, Pieter Wuille via bitcoin-dev wrote: > > > > I think it's probably less complex to close some of the doors? > > > 2) are short ids available/meaningful to send prior to VERACK being > > >

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Codex32

2023-02-20 Thread Andrew Poelstra via bitcoin-dev
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 09:16:02PM -0500, Russell O'Connor via bitcoin-dev wrote: > I've been asked by Dr. Curr and Professor Snead to forward this message to > this mailing list, as it may be of general interest to Bitcoin users. > > > I have opened a PR to the BIPs repo for this scheme: https

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Codex32

2023-02-20 Thread Pavol Rusnak via bitcoin-dev
Thanks Andrew! New draft makes it much more obvious what are the differences between Codex32 and SLIP-0039 scheme. -- Best Regards / S pozdravom, Pavol "Stick" Rusnak Co-Founder, SatoshiLabs ___ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundatio

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Contracting Primitives WG 4rd Meeting, Tuesday 21 Feb. 18:00 UTC

2023-02-20 Thread Antoine Riard via bitcoin-dev
Reminder: this is happening this _upcoming_ Tuesday. Looking forward to the fourth session to roam over things like anyprevout, the annex, vault primitive, annexcarrier! Issue opened if anyone would like to propose an agenda topic: https://github.com/ariard/bitcoin-contracting-primitives-wg/issue