Re: [bitcoin-dev] Pseudocode for robust tail emission

2023-01-05 Thread Billy Tetrud via bitcoin-dev
> In Bitcoin "the show must go on" and someone must pay for it. Active [and/or] passive users I certainly agree. > or more precisely: tiny inflation 👍 > Right now security comes from almost fully from ~1.8% inflation. Best I could find, fees make up about 13% of miner revenue

Re: [bitcoin-dev] A Bitcoin NFT System

2023-01-05 Thread Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev
Hi Vincent, Indeed the gist was recorded (by mistake) as secret but the link is supposed to work anyway, I have made it public, thanks for confirming that it's working now, just in case I am attaching the text file Regards Aymeric Le 04/01/2023 à 21:59, Vincenzo a écrit : > On Thu Dec 29, 2022

Re: [bitcoin-dev] A Bitcoin NFT System

2023-01-05 Thread Vincenzo via bitcoin-dev
On Thu Dec 29, 2022 at 5:49 PM CET, Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev wrote: > I am not a fan of NFTs as currently designed and used, centralized, > insecure, duplicable, virtual, stealable, not signed, expensive > > But if you consider that a NFT is anything that you can buy or store, as > something r

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Refreshed BIP324

2023-01-05 Thread Pieter Wuille via bitcoin-dev
--- Original Message --- On Friday, November 18th, 2022 at 3:24 AM, Anthony Towns wrote: > > * etc > > So this gives a uniform space which commands can be assigned from, and > > there is no strict need for thinking of the short-binary and > > long-alphabetic commands as distinct. In v2

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Refreshed BIP324

2023-01-05 Thread Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev
On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 10:06:29PM +, Pieter Wuille via bitcoin-dev wrote: > > > So this gives a uniform space which commands can be assigned from, and > > > there is no strict need for thinking of the short-binary and > > > long-alphabetic commands as distinct. In v2, some short ones would b

[bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Contracting Primitives WG 3rd Meeting, Tuesday 17 Jan. 18:00 UTC

2023-01-05 Thread Antoine Riard via bitcoin-dev
Hi list, I'm proposing Tuesday 17th January at 18:00 UTC, i.e week from now for the 3rd Bitcoin contracting primitives WG meeting (the third Tuesday of January month, as done previously). As a soft proposal for an agenda, it would be to start with the leftover of the last meeting agenda. Namely,