Re: [bitcoin-dev] On mempool policy consistency

2022-10-29 Thread David A. Harding via bitcoin-dev
On 2022-10-26 13:52, Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev wrote: The cutoff for that is probably something like "do 30% of listening nodes have a compatible policy"? If they do, then you'll have about a 95% chance of having at least one of your outbound peers accept your tx, just by random chance. I

Re: [bitcoin-dev] On mempool policy consistency

2022-10-29 Thread Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev
On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 09:45:09PM -1000, David A. Harding via bitcoin-dev wrote: > I think this might be understating the problem. A 95% chance of having > an outbound peer accept your tx conversely implies 1 in 20 payments will > fail to propagate on their initial broadcast. Whether that's ter

Re: [bitcoin-dev] On mempool policy consistency

2022-10-29 Thread Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev
On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 09:29:47PM +0100, Antoine Riard via bitcoin-dev wrote: > Let's take the contra. (I don't think I know that phrase? Is it like "play devil's advocate"?) > I would say the current post describes the state of Bitcoin Core and > beyond policy > rules with a high-degree of exha

Re: [bitcoin-dev] On mempool policy consistency

2022-10-29 Thread Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev
On Sun, Oct 30, 2022 at 11:02:43AM +1000, Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev wrote: > > Some napkin math: there are about 250,000 transactions a day; if > > we round that up to 100 million a year and assume we only want one > > transaction per year to fail to initially propagate on a network where > > 3