On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 7:54 AM ZmnSCPxj wrote:
> My point is that in the past we were willing to discuss the complicated
> crypto math around cross-input sigagg in order to save bytes, so it seems
> to me that cross-input compression of puzzles/solutions at least merits a
> discussion, since it
> A. Every pollee signs messages like support:10%}> for each UTXO they want to respond to the poll with.
It should not be expressed in percents, but in amounts. It would be easier and
more compatible with votes where there is 100% oppose or 100% support (and also
easier to handle if some LN use
> There are two use-cases for OP_RETURN: committing to data, and publishing
> data. Your proposal can only do the former, not the latter, and there are
> use-cases for both.
Only the former is needed. Pushing data on-chain is expensive and that kind of
data is useful only to the transaction mak
