Hi Marek,
Marek Palatinus wrote on 8/31/21 3:47 AM:
I fully agree with sipa and his reasoning that this proposal is not solving any particular
problem, but making it actually a bit worse.
Ok, I understand. I'm just trying to find ways to reduce the risk of sending to the wrong
address and to ma
Good morning ZmnSCPxj,
Thanks for sharing all the details. One thing that I am not sure about:
> * We already ***know*** that blockchains cannot scale
> * Your plan for scaling is to make ***more*** blockchains?
Scaling Bitcoin can be different from scaling Bitcoin sidechains. You can
experimen
> of course stacks can do this even without drivechain, so not sure whatwe're
> hiding from there
Stacks is not a Bitcoin sidechain IMO. It has its own native token which isn't
pegged to BTC. Premined. It uses Bitcoin as a storage and broadcast medium for
recording all blocks. Marketing with l
Hi Bitcoin Devs,
I recently noticed a flaw in the Sequence lock implementation with respect
to upgradability. It might be the case that this is protected against by
some transaction level policy (didn't see any in policy.cpp, but if not,
I've put up a blogpost explaining the defect and patching it
