Hi ZmnSCPxj,
Why you get the signal “trust the Gazin wallet”?
Sabu is a protocol and the Gazin wallet will be an implementation of
that protocol. We will implement it in react-native language to support
both Android and iPhone. Of course it will be open source and GPL3.
Here is the repository an
On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 2:09 AM raymo via bitcoin-dev
wrote:
>
> Hi ZmnSCPxj,
>
> Why you get the signal “trust the Gazin wallet”?
> Sabu is a protocol and the Gazin wallet will be an implementation of
> that protocol. We will implement it in react-native language to support
> both Android and iPh
Hi Andrew,
I just have a small suggestion on this proposal.
On Tue, 22 Jun 2021 at 23:29, Andrew Chow via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> | Taproot Leaf Script
> | PSBT_IN_TAP_LEAF_SCRIPT = 0x15
> |
> | The control block for this leaf as specified in BIP 341. The c
Hi James,
Sorry for not responding in detail.
So, lets jump in the critiques.
> You're making the assumption that miners won't build on top of a block
with transactions they have not seen before or transactions that may
contain double spends of unconfirmed inputs
No, it is a wish. I hope in futur
> If nSequence is set it should apply only to the first input of the
transaction, if it has multiple inputs.
This could have complications with DLCs and dual funded lightning. In both
protocols the ordering of the inputs is not know until both parties have
revealed all of their inputs, and durin
On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 3:52 AM wrote:
>
>
> Hi James,
> Sorry for not responding in detail.
> So, lets jump in the critiques.
>
> > You're making the assumption that miners won't build on top of a block
> with transactions they have not seen before or transactions that may
> contain double spends
Good morning Raymo,
> Hi ZmnSCPxj,
>
> Why you get the signal “trust the Gazin wallet”?
> Sabu is a protocol and the Gazin wallet will be an implementation of
> that protocol. We will implement it in react-native language to support
> both Android and iPhone. Of course it will be open source and G
Hi Salvatore,
On 6/28/21 6:03 AM, Salvatore Ingala wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> I just have a small suggestion on this proposal.
>
> On Tue, 22 Jun 2021 at 23:29, Andrew Chow via bitcoin-dev
> wrote:
>
>> | Taproot Leaf Script
>> | PSBT_IN_TAP_LEAF_SCRIPT = 0x15
>> |
>> | The control block for this
Hi James,
> There's only one practical approach I'm aware of for miners to actually
> do this, and that would be to effectively make mining centralized.
> So I would highly discourage this sort of policy when it comes to mining.
I do not know about the approach you talking about it, but my soluti
> What prevents the creditor from signing a transaction that is neither a valid
> MT nor a GT?
Please stop comparing Sabu and Lightning. Otherwise, it won't let you
true understanding of Sabu.
In Sabu protocol, only the issuer (the UTXO owner) can sign the
transaction and decide how much money
Hi ZmnSCPxj & Raymo,
> On Jun 28, 2021, at 8:28 AM, ZmnSCPxj via bitcoin-dev
> wrote:
>
> Good morning Raymo,
>
>> Hi ZmnSCPxj,
>> […]
> What prevents the creditor from signing a transaction that is neither a valid
> MT nor a GT?
>
> Nothing.
How would the creditor create such a transaction
Hi Greg,
You are right, the whole scenario is:
there is an issuer which own a UTXO
issuers get fiat money or goods or services from creditor in exchange of
a transaction.
the transactions are intended to circulate in Sabu protocol instead of
sending to Bitcoin network.
creditor can not sign the tra
I believe Zman meant issuer.
raymo via bitcoin-dev escreveu
no dia segunda, 28/06/2021 à(s) 18:45:
>
> Hi Greg,
> You are right, the whole scenario is:
> there is an issuer which own a UTXO
> issuers get fiat money or goods or services from creditor in exchange of
> a transaction.
> the transacti
Hey Raymo,
Here’s a scenario:
Alice has one UTXO.
Suppose Alice sends Bob an MT and a GT over Sabu, and Bob gives whatever
goods and services to Alice.
Alice then goes and spends that UTXO to Charlie with a higher fee than the
GT she sent to Bob. Charlie has no idea that Bob exists, because he
Hey Alex,
Your scenario works perfectly unless we put some restrictions on
accepting transaction by creditor (in our case Bob).
These are restrictions:
Alice has to use a UTXO (or some UTXOs) worth at least 40,000 Sat as
transaction input.
Alice has to reserve 10,000 Sat as transaction fee (for
Hi Andrew,
Thanks for the clarification, I was indeed reading it under the mistaken
assumption that only one leaf would be added to the PSBT.
En passant, for the less experienced readers, it might be helpful if the
key types that are possibly present multiple times (with different keydata)
were s
16 matches
Mail list logo
