Re: [bitcoin-dev] Decentralized Naming Protocol BIP

You appear to have reinvented Namecoin ;) On 2021-04-21 20:28, Christopher Gilliard via bitcoin-dev wrote: I have created an additional BIP that is associated with the recent BIPs that I have sent to the mailing list. This one defines a decentralized naming protocol. The BIP can be found here:ht

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Decentralized Naming Protocol BIP

Yeah, kinda, but without the alt and integrated into the other systems that I've proposed and it maps names to onion addresses instead of ips. It's needed for some of the applications I've been thinking about. On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 1:55 PM wrote: > You appear to have reinvented Namecoin ;) > >

[bitcoin-dev] And Then What? Defining a Complete Process for Upgrades

This letter is particularly aimed at addressing Rusty Russell's quest for a development process that respects all groups in a balance of powers. However, in the spirit of open discussion, I'm sending it directly to the list. This proposal is aimed to be compatible with Taproot's ST, and I hope wil

[bitcoin-dev] Proposed BIP editor: Kalle Alm

Unless there are objections, I intend to add Kalle Alm as a BIP editor to assist in merging PRs into the bips git repo. Since there is no explicit process to adding BIP editors, IMO it should be fine to use BIP 2's Process BIP progression: > A process BIP may change status from Draft to Active

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Proposed BIP editor: Kalle Alm

ACK adding Kalle. Kalle is a qualified reviewer / editor and well suited for this role. -- @JeremyRubin On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 7:09 PM Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > Unless there