Hello Christopher,
Decentralized storage as an idea looks interesting. I am researching about
similar things for one of my Bitcoin project. Although an implementation or
proof of concept code in the BIP would have been better. Also since this
involves LN, maybe it can just be a LN project inste
Hello Yanmaani,
Incentives for UTXO consolidation already exists IMO.
1.If UTXO consolidation is done when fee rates are low (less congestion in
mempool), it helps in saving money in lot of cases. Example:
https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/a/100811/
2.If running full node for Bitcoin, it will h
Thanks Prayank. I think the next step for both of these proposals is to
define an API. I thought about including that in the BIPs and decided it
wasn't necessary yet to get the ideas across initially. Maybe when the APIs
are defined they could go into the BIP, but it's probably better to have in
a
I have created an additional BIP that is associated with the recent BIPs
that I have sent to the mailing list. This one defines a decentralized
naming protocol. The BIP can be found here:
https://github.com/cgilliard/bips/blob/naming/bip-.mediawiki
Please reply with any feedback, questions, or
