The reject message is helpful for figuring out why a tx was rejected.
It’s not useful for determining success, yes. Particularly when doing
segwit / newer types of tx’s as there’s always one or more pesky nodes who
still don’t support it and send a reject message for perfectly good tx’s.
But afte
Re-sending to the list since it never made it
BIP or not, at least this process desserves to be documented precisely
Message transféré
Sujet : Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP proposal - Signatures of Messages using
Bitcoin Private Keys
Date : Mon, 18 Feb 2019 16:29:34 -0800
De :
On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 4:39 PM Trey Del Bonis via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Keeping 20 around is a little excessive but it gives 390700800 possible
> wallets. So security can be trivially parameterized based on how secure you
> want your wallet to be if someone
>Mid-level hardware can check 50k addresses per second, which means it would
>only take around 2 hours to check all possibilities.
Yes that's a problem that I'm now realizing exists. Whoops! Changing
the parameters to a 25-of-50 setup gets us ~129 bits in that case,
which is better but still so
On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 12:22 AM Wladimir J. van der Laan via
bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Field addr has a variable length, with a maximum of 32 bytes
> (256 bits). Clients SHOULD reject
> longer addresses.
Is 32 bytes long enough for I2P? It seems like there are two formats,
is there a reason we might
Concept ACK.
> ==Considerations==
>
> (to be discussed)
>
> * ''Client MAY store and gossip address formats that they do not know
> about'': does it ever make sense to gossip addresses outside a certain
> overlay network? Say, I2P addresses to Tor? I'm not sure. Especially for
> networks that
I would like to grab the opportunity to point out that I am doing the same,
but in the form of presentations. I started with a two part presentation,
but I decided to make it into a 6 part presentation series in the future.
Part 1: Concentrating on network level privacy -
https://vimeo.com/album/57
