[bitcoin-dev] BIP 174 thoughts

2018-06-29 Thread matejcik via bitcoin-dev
Short version: - I propose that conflicting "values" for the same "key" are considered invalid. - Let's not optimize for invalid data. - Given that, there's an open question on how to handle invalid data when encountered In general, I don't think it's possible to enforce correctness at the format

Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP 174 thoughts

2018-06-29 Thread Achow101 via bitcoin-dev
Hi, I do not think that protobuf is the way to go for this. Not only is it another dependency which many wallets do not want to add (e.g. Armory has not added BIP 70 support because of its dependency on protobuf), but it is a more drastic change than the currently proposed changes. The point of

Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP 174 thoughts

2018-06-29 Thread Peter D. Gray via bitcoin-dev
... > I believe that this discussion has become bikeshedding and is really no > longer constructive. ... Thanks for saying this Andrew! I agree with your point of view, and personally I'm ready to lock this BIP down ... or at least move it to the next level of approval. ... > I propose to mov