Good morning Pieter and Tim and all,
My understanding is that the idea now being discussed by Pieter and Tim is that
the Graftroot signature is not `sign(P, script)` but instead `sign(P,
sighash(tx))`, where `tx` is an "ordinary" transaction that spends the outpoint
that pays to `P`, and a sing
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 12:12 PM, ZmnSCPxj via bitcoin-dev
wrote:
> This has the advantage that the Graftroot signature commits to a single
> outpoint and cannot be used to spend all outpoints that happen to pay to the
> same `P` public key.
If it isn't possible to make a graftroot signature in
Hi,
On June 15, 2018 4:34 PM, Pieter Wuille via bitcoin-dev
wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> given some recent work and discussions around BIP 174 (Partially
> Signed Bitcoin Transaction Format) I'd like to bring up a few ideas.
> First of all, it's unclear to me to what extent projects have already
