On 10 Apr 2018, at 00:39, m...@musalbas.com wrote:
> The original disclosure didn't contain any information about the library
> in question, so I did some digging.
>
> I think that the vulnerability disclosure is referring to a pre-2013
> version of jsbn, a JavaScript crypto library. Before it use
I used jsbn in the past, then I made some research too
Apparently window.crypto.getRandomValues was introduced in jsbn mid 2012
(according to the wayback machine, but 2012/2013 does not make any
difference, see below), was available in Chrome since 2011 (but indeed
see "window.crypto.getRandomValu
>> Note that even with v1.4, it still does not use high-quality entropy for
>> Internet Explorer, because getRandomValues is provided under window.msCrypto
>> for that browser.
>
> I don't know for that one, what was the issue?
I simply meant that Internet Explorer implements the Web Cryptography
Indeed, this impacts jsbn only normally since all others from the time
getRandomValues was available are supposed to implement both
Le 10/04/2018 à 15:32, Jason Davies a écrit :
>>> Note that even with v1.4, it still does not use high-quality entropy for
>>> Internet Explorer, because getRandomVa
Hi,
I have few questions regarding ListTransaction RPC call and I hope you can
help me.
Documentation for the RPC call is here:
https://bitcoin.org/en/developer-reference#listtransactions
1. What does it mean for a transaction ( with 0 confirmations ) to be
*trusted* or not?
There is such field i
2) -1 doesn't mean conflicted, it means the transaction is not only
unconfirmed buy depends on another unconfirmed transaction.
1) Depends on what you mean by trusted. If you are giving the user online
access to something that costs you next to nothing to revoke if there is a
problem later, no pr
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 5:29 AM, Maksim Solovjov via bitcoin-dev
wrote:
> 1. What does it mean for a transaction ( with 0 confirmations ) to be
> trusted or not?
It is trusted if (1) it is final (i.e. it can't be replaced), (2) it
is not in a block that was reorged out (negative confirmation coun
Clarification on one part below:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 2:21 PM, Karl-Johan Alm
wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 5:29 AM, Maksim Solovjov via bitcoin-dev
> wrote:
>> 1. What does it mean for a transaction ( with 0 confirmations ) to be
>> trusted or not?
>
> It is trusted if (1) it is final (i.
