Good morning,
>ZmnSCPxj wrote:
>> Hodlers have much greater power in hardfork situations than miners
>
>Not when hodlers are more evenly split between coins. Miners will prefer
>the coin with higher transaction fees which will erode hodler confidence
>via longer delays. This means transaction fees
Since there is no surviving argument in this thread contrary to my original
post, I'll begin work on a BIP.
___
bitcoin-dev mailing list
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
> On Oct 12, 2017, at 3:40 AM, ZmnSCPxj via bitcoin-dev
> wrote:
>
> As most Core developers hodl vast amounts, it is far more likely that any
> hardfork that goes against what Core wishes will collapse, simply by Core
> developers acting in their capacity as hodlers of Bitcoin, without need
ZmnSCPxj wrote:
> Thus even if the unwanted chain provides 2 tokens as fee per block,
> whereas the wanted chain provides 1 token as fee per block, if the
> unwanted chain tokens are valued at 1/4 the wanted chain tokens, miners
> will still prefer the wanted chain regardless.
This is a good point
